Enacting shared narratives in work counselling
A narrative study of how work counsellors can support service users in the process of returning to work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15845/ntvp.v10i1.4076Keywords:
Guidance, Supervision, Working relation, Social work, User involvement, Qualitative researchAbstract
Work counselling is complex and challenging. Research highlights the importance of user involvement and client-professional relationships for successful counselling outcomes. In this narrative case study, we explored how work counsellors may support service users in the process of returning to work, by focusing on meaning-making processes in counselling. We created data through a narrative interview and conducted a narrative analysis of the data. Our findings show how counsellors may support users through being open for multiple understandings of the situation, in particular users’ ongoing narratives. Further, our findings show how believing in, and acting on, users’ ongoing plots, may help in the process of returning to work. We discuss how our findings of counsellors’ role in meaning-making processes may shed light on how user involvement can be put into practice, but also how this may involve some dilemmas.
References
Alsaker, S. (2009). Narrative in action: Meaning-making in everyday activities of women living with chronic rheumatic conditions [Doctoral thesis]. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/267660
Alsaker, S., & Josephsson, S. (2010). Occupation and Meaning: Narrative in Everyday Activities of Women with Chronic Rheumatic Conditions. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 30(2), 58-67. https://doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20100312-01
Andersen, M. L. (2020). Involvement or empowerment-Assumptions and differences in social work practice. Nordic Social Work Research, 10(3), 283-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2018.1526104
Askheim, O. P. (2020). Brukermedvirkning–fra politikk til praksis: Hvordan implementeres de politiske målsettingene på bakkenivå? [User Participation – from Policy to Practice: How Do the Street-Level Bureaucrats Implement the Political Goals?]. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning, 23(3), 170-186. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.0809-2052-2020-03-02
Askheim, O. P., & Andersen, J. (2023). Brukermedvirkningens mange ansikter [The many faces of user involvement]. Fagbokforlaget.
Bouchard, N. (2016). The dark side of public participation: Participative processes that legitimize elected officials’ values. Canadian Public Administration, 59(4). 516-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12199
Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018). Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public services. Routledge.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674029019
Danneris, S. (2018). Ready to work (yet)? Unemployment trajectories among vulnerable welfare recipients. Qualitative Social Work, 17(3), 355-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325016672916
Danneris, S., & Nielsen, M. H. (2018). Bringing the client back in: A comparison between political rationality and the experiences of the unemployed. Social Policy & Administration, 52(7), 1441-1454. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12386
Frankl, V. E. (1963). Man's search for meaning: an introduction to logotherapy. Washington square press.
Gergen, K. J. (2015). An invitation to social construction. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921276
Goffman, E. (1978). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth.
Halvorsen, K., Andenæs, E., & Hammerstad, G. T. (2020). Ansvar, fag og følelser: kommunikative utfordringer i brukermøter i NAV. [Responsibility, profession and feelings: communicative challenges in meetings with users in NAV]. Senter for faglig kommunikasjon, Institutt for språk og litteratur, NTNU. https://www.nav.no/no/nav-og-samfunn/kunnskap/forskningsrapporter-og-evalueringer-finansiert-av-nav/navs-tiltak-og-virkemidler-rapportarkiv/ansvar-fag-og-folelser-kommunikative-utfordringer-i-brukermoter-i-nav
Hansen, H. C., & Natland, S. (2017). The working relationship between social worker and service user in an activation policy context. Nordic Social Work Research, 7(2), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857x.2016.1221850
Hasenfeld, Y. (2010). The attributes of human service organizations. In Y. Hasenfeld (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (2nd ed., pp. 9-32). Sage.
Helgøy, I., Kildal, N., & Nilssen, E. (2010). Mot en ny yrkesrolle i Nav? [Towards a new professional role in Nav?]. In: Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies, Notat 1. https://hdl.handle.net/1956/5357
Høiby, A., & Ranger, M. N. (2019). Kamuflert ekspertrolle – et paradoks i endringsarbeid [Camouflaged Expert Role – A Paradox in Change Work]. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning, 22(4), 298-312. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-3076-2019-04-03
Josephsson, S., Asaba, E., Jonsson, H., & Alsaker, S. (2006). Creativity and order in communication: Implications from philosophy to narrative research concerning human occupation. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 13(2), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038120600691116
Kierkegaard, S., Hong, E. H., & Hong, H. V. (1998). Kierkegaard's Writings, XXII, Volume 22: The Point of View (E. H. Hong & H. V. Hong, Trans.). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400832408
Klausen, R. K. (2016). Brukermedvirkning i psykisk helsearbeid: En oppsummering av kunnskap. Senter for omsorgsforskning. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2412219
Klausen, R. K., Blix, B. H., Karlsson, M., Haugsgjerd, S., & Lorem, G. F. (2017). Shared decision making from the service users’ perspective: A narrative study from community mental health centers in northern Norway. Social Work in Mental Health, 15(3), 354-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2016.1222981
Knizek, B. L., Alsaker, S., Hagen, J., Haugan, G., Lehmann, O., Nilsen, M., Reidunsdatter, R., & Sæther, W. (2021). Meaning-making: a Underestimated Resource for Health? A Discussion of the Value of Meaning-making in the Conservation and Restoration of Health and Well-being. Encyclopaideia, 25(59), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-8670/11986
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
Ljungberg, A., Denhov, A., & Topor, A. (2016). Non-helpful relationships with professionals – a literature review of the perspective of persons with severe mental illness. Journal of Mental Health, 25(3), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2015.1101427
Matthies, A-L.; Närhi, K.; Kokkonen, T. (2018). The Promise and Deception of participation in Welfare Services for Unemployed Young People. Critical Social Work, 19(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.22329/csw.v19i2.5677
Mattingly, C. (1998). Healing dramas and clinical plots: The narrative structure of experience (Vol. 7). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167017
McLaughlin, H. (2009). What’s in the name: ‘Client’, ‘patient’, customer’, ‘consumer’, ‘expert by experience’, ‘service user’ – What’s next? British Journal of Social Work, 39(6), 1101-1117. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm155
Natland, S., Bjerke, E., & Torstenssen, T. B. (2019). «Jeg fikk blankpusset håpet om at jeg hadde en framtid» Opplevelser av god hjelp i møter med Nav ["My hope in a future was polished" Experiences of good help in meetings with Nav]. Fontene forskning, 12(1), 17-29. https://fontene.no/forskning/jeg-fikk-blankpusset-hapet-om-at-jeg-hadde-en-framtid-6.584.876742.6a95922d51
Natland, S., & Celik, H. D. (2015). Service Users' Self-Narratives on Their Journey from Shame to Pride: Tales of Transition. Journal of evidence-informed social work, 12(1), 50-63.
NAV (n.d.). Veiledningsplattformen [Support document for the counsellors at the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration]. Navet.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International journal of qualitative studies in education, 8(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839950080103
Prop. 33 (2015-2016). NAV i en ny tid - for arbeid og aktivitet [NAV in a new time - for work and activity]. Ministry of Labour and Social Inclusion. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-33-20152016/id2501017/
Reed, N. P., Josephsson, S., & Alsaker, S. (2017). Community mental health work: Negotiating support of users' recovery. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 27(2), 814-822. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12368
Reed, N. P. (2020). Personal Recovery-Unique and Collective Exploring Enacted Narratives of Mental Health Recovery in Everyday Life [Doctoral thesis]. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2688487
Reed, N. P., Josephsson, S., & Alsaker, S. (2020). A narrative study of mental health recovery: Exploring unique, open-ended and collective processes. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1747252
Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and Narrative (K. McLaughlinn & D. Pellauer, Trans.; Vol. 1 ). The University of Chicago Press. First published in 1983.
Ricoeur, P. (1991). From Text to Action, Essays in Hermeneutics, II (K. Blamey & J. Thompson, Trans.). Northwestern University Press. First published in 1986.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Rosenthal, G. (2003). The healing effects of storytelling: On the conditions of curative storytelling in the context of research and counseling. Qualitative inquiry, 9(6), 9933. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403254888
Røhnebæk, M. (2016). Fra bakkebyråkrati til skjermbyråkrati. [From street-level bereaucracy to screen-level bureaucracy]. Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning, 19(4), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-3076-2016-04-01
Skarli, J. B. (2021). Creating or destructing value in use? Handling cognitive impairments in co-creation with serious and chronically ill users. Administrative Sciences, 11(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010016
Skjefstad, N. S. (2015). Sosialt arbeid i overgangen til NAV–utfordringer for en anerkjennende praksis [Social work in the transition to NAV –challenges to a practice based on recognition]. [Doctoral disertation]. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2360351
Sorgendal, M. S., & Reed, N. P. (2023). A Narrative Case Study of How Individuals Construct Meaning Concerning Their Situation Through Their Meetings with Work Counsellors. Nordic Journal of Transitions, Careers and Guidance, 4(1), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.16993/njtcg.72
Stenbrenden, S. H., Knutsen, M., & Ruud, I. (2018). Sterke møter: En kvalitativ studie av hvordan kvinnelige brukere opplever samarbeidet med veiledere i NAV [Emotional meetings: A qualitative study of how female users experience collaboration with supervisors in NAV]. Tidsskrift for psykisk helsearbeid, 15(2-3), 159-169. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3010-2018-02-03-07
Strong, T. (2003). Getting curious about meaning-making in counselling (1)1. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 31(3), 259-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/0306988031000147875
Vabø, M. (2014). Dilemmaer i velferdens organisering [Dilemmas in the Organisation of Welfare]. In M. Vabø & S. I. Vabo (Ed.), Velferdens organisering [The Organization of Welfare] (pp. 11-28). Universitetsforlaget.
Varkey, B. (2021). Principles of clinical ethics and their application to practice. Medical Principles and Practice, 30(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509119
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marie Sorgendal, Nina Petersen Reed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
