Nursing students' experiences from testing a software program for practicum supervision in municipal health care institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15845/ntvp.v9i2.4107Keywords:
Technology, MOSO, nursing practice, peer learning, municipal health care servicesAbstract
Background: A software program designed for practicum supervision, MOSO, was tested as one of four measures in a regional recruitment project, which focused on facilitating positive practice experiences from clinical studies in municipal health care institutions for nursing students in their first year of study. The article presents the students' experiences with testing MOSO.
Method: Eight focus group interviews were conducted with a total of 40 students, five in each interview. The data material was analyzed thematically, inspired by the approach of Braun and Clarke.
Results: The students experienced that MOSO was not adapted to nursing practice and had a lack of utility together with the other measures in the project. At the same time, they valued having a digital platform for information, communication and reflection in their practical studies.
Conclusion: The testing of a software program for practicum supervision supported to a small extent the study´s purpose of facilitating good practical experiences for the nursing students. At the same time, the results indicate that students might benefit from a digital platform for interaction in their practical studies. The study also highlighted the importance of thorough preparation and training in digital tools, as well as adapting software to the target group and context.
References
Antonovsky, A. (2012). Helsens mysterium: Den salutogene modellen. Gyldendal akademisk.
Anvik, C. H., Bliksvær, T., & Olesen, E. S. B. (2021). «Gruppen mener»? Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning, 24(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-3076-2021-01-03
Beauregard, P., Arnaert, A., & Ponzoni, N. (2017). Nursing students' perceptions of using smartphones in the community practicum: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 53, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.03.002
Bjørndal, C. R. P., Mathisen, P., Wennergren, A.-C., & Thornberg, F. (2023). Exploring the use of technology designed to support the supervision process in teacher training placements. Nordisk tidsskrift i veiledningspedagogikk, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.15845/ntvp.v8i1.3745
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: a practical guide. SAGE.
Chen, B., Wang, Y., Xiao, L., Xu, C., Shen, Y., Qin, Q., Li, C., Chen, F., Leng, Y., Yang, T., & Sun, Z. (2021). Effects of mobile learning for nursing students in clinical education: A meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 97, 104706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104706
Dahle, A. O. (2019, 10.12.). Praksis på sykehjem. Den nye favoritten blant sykepleierstudenter i Agder? [Internett] [hentet 28. august 2024] Tilgjengelig fra: https://www.uia.no/om-uia/fakultet/helse-og-idrettsvitenskap/studentintervju/andreas-oddnes-dahle.html
De Presno, Å. K., Gundersen, E. D., & Sætra, M. K. R. (2023). Klare retningslinjer er vesentlig ved fare for ikke bestått praksis. Tidsskriftet sykepleien. https://doi.org/10.4220/Sykepleiens.2023.91388
Floberg, E. (2019, 11.12.). Hvordan gi kommunen bedre rykte. [Internett] [hentet 28. august 2024] Tilgjengelig fra: https://www.uia.no/om-uia/fakultet/helse-og-idrettsvitenskap/studentintervju/elise-floberg.html
Forber, J., DiGiacomo, M., Carter, B., Davidson, P., Phillips, J., & Jackson, D. (2016). In pursuit of an optimal model of undergraduate nurse clinical education: An integrative review. Nurse Education in Practice, 21, 83-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.09.007
Fossum, M., Opsal, A., & Ehrenberg, A. (2022). Nurses' sources of information to inform clinical practice: An integrative review to guide evidence‐based practice. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 19(5), 372-379. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12569
Gautun, H. (2020). En utvikling som må snus. Bemanning og kompetanse i sykehjem og hjemmesykepleien (Rapport 2020/14). [Internett] Velferdsforskningsinstituttet NOVA. [hentet 18. august 2024] Tilgjengelig fra: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12199/6417
Gundersen, E. D. (2021). Sluttrapport JOBBVINNER AGDER Tilrettelegge for gode praksiserfaringer i kommunehelsetjenesten for første års sykepleierstudenter. [Internett] KS Agder. [hentet 18. august 2024] Tilgjengelig fra: https://www.ks.no/globalassets/jobbvinner/rapporter/Sluttrapport-Jobbvinner-Agder-2017-2020.pdf
Gundersen, E. D., Jentoft, N., Svensson, O. J., & Hellang, Ø. (2023). Arbeidsmiljøets betydning for sykepleierstudenters valg av arbeidsgiver En kvalitativ studie med søkelys på rekruttering av sykepleiere til kommunale helse- og omsorgstjenester. Nordisk tidsskrift for helseforskning, 19(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.7557/14.6751
Haddeland, K. (2023). Digitalisering kan løse praksisutfordringer. Sykepleien, e-91590. https://doi.org/10.4220/Sykepleiens.2023.91590
Hegerstrøm, T. (2018). Til glede og besvær – praksis i høyere utdanning. Analyse av studentenes kommentarer i Stuidebarometeret 2016 [Internett]. NOKUT [hentet 18. august 2024] Tilgjengelig fra: https://www.nokut.no/globalassets/nokut/rapporter/ua/2018/hegerstrom_turid_til_glede_og_besvar_praksis_i_hoyere_utdanning_3-2018.pdf
Heinonen, A.-T., Kääriäinen, M., Juntunen, J., & Mikkonen, K. (2019). Nursing students’ experiences of nurse teacher mentoring and beneficial digital technologies in a clinical practice setting. Nurse Education in Practice, 40, 102631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102631
KD, HOD, & KS. (2022). Avtale mellom regjeringen og KS om kvalitets- og kapasitetsøkning i praksis for helse- og sosialfagstudenter 2022-2025. [Internett] [hentet 18. august 2024] Tilgjengelig fra: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/5c5380ee35c1449fb61ad681668425d0/nr.-7-signert-avtale-om-kvalitet-og-kapasitetsokning-i-praksis-for-helse-og-sosialfagstudenter.pdf
Koch, T. B., Øgård-Repål, A., De Presno, Å. K., & Gundersen, E. D. (2023). Erfaringer med modeller for veiledet praksis i sykepleierutdanningen i Skandinavia: en scoping review. Nordisk Sygeplejeforskning. https://doi.org/10.18261/nsf.13.2.1
KS. (2021). Kommunesektorens arbeidsgivermonitor 2021. [Internett] [hentet 18. august 2024] Tilgjengelig fra: https://www.ks.no/globalassets/fagomrader/arbeidsgiverpolitikk/nyskapende-arbeidsgivere/Kommunesektorens-arbeidsgivermonitor-2021.pdf
Laugaland, K. A., Gonzalez, M. T., McCormack, B., Skovdahl, K.-I., Slettebø, Å., Billett, S., & Akerjordet, K. (2020). Improving quality in clinical placement studies in nursing homes (QUALinCLINstud): the study protocol of a participatory mixed-methods multiple case study design. BMJ Open, 10(10), e040491. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040491
Malterud, K. (2017). Kvalitative forskningsmetoder for medisin og helsefag (4. utg.). Universitetsforlaget.
Moi, T. (2013, 10.08). «Å skrive er å tenke». Dagens Næringsliv.
MOSO. (n.d.). [Internett] [hentet 18. august 2024] Tilgjengelig fra: https://moso.as/
Nes, A. A. G., Zlamal, J., Linnerud, S. C. W., Steindal, S. A., & Solberg, M. T. (2023). A Technology-Supported Guidance Model to Increase the Flexibility, Quality, and Efficiency of Nursing Education in Clinical Practice in Norway: Development Study of the TOPP-N Application Prototype. JMIR Hum Factors, 10, e44101. https://doi.org/10.2196/44101
NOU 2023:4. Tid for handling. Personellet i en bærekraftig helse- og omsorgstjeneste [Internett] [hentet 18. august 2024] Tilgjengelig fra: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/337fef958f2148bebd326f0749a1213d/no/pdfs/nou202320230004000dddpdfs.pdf
O'Connor, S., & Andrews, T. (2015). Mobile technology and its use in clinical nursing education: a literature review. Journal of Nursing Education, 54(3), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20150218-01
O'Connor, S., & Andrews, T. (2018). Smartphones and mobile applications (apps) in clinical nursing education: A student perspective. Nurse Education Today, 69, 172-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.07.013
Polit, D., & Beck, C. (2018). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (9th eds.). Philadelphia: PA, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Stone, R., Cooper, S., & Cant, R. (2013). The value of peer learning in undergraduate nursing education: a systematic review. ISRN Nursing, 2013, 930901. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/930901
Trondsen, M., & Sandaunet, A. G. (2009). The dual role of the action researcher. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.09.005
Universitetet i Agder. (n.d.-a). MOSO i sykepleierutdanningen. [Internett] [hentet 28. august 2024] Tilgjengelig fra: https://www.uia.no/forskning/prosjekter/helse-idrett/moso-sykepleie.html
Universitetet i Agder. (n.d.-b). MOSO Praksisverktøy. [Internett] [hentet 28. august 2024] Tilgjengelig fra: https://www.uia.no/om-uia/fakultet/lererutdanningene/praksis-lu/moso.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ellen Dahl Gundersen, Elise Floberg-Haugen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
