The Professional as Prophet: The social magic of professional knowledge
The social magic of professional knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15845/praxeologi.v6.4195Abstract
The concept of ‘profession’ is typically linked to the strength derived from its neutrality and the specialised knowledge and skills the professional is expected to possess, supported by a self-affirmative narrative of the group’s capabilities and merits. Professions have become powerful forces for conceptualisation both the world of their own, that of the general public and caring out solutions for a wide range of human challenges. This makes it obvious to examine the forms of social dominance that come with professionalisation. The inquiries are fundamentally preoccupied with the inherent contradiction between person and profession, and between the arbitrariness of subjectivity and the universalised concern of a profession. The presentation follows three steps. 1) The will of a profession comes with a false neutrality and by that with a social dominance, working explicitly as well as implicitly. 2) Goffman and Bourdieu then show how this dominance works, rooted in professional practice itself, as they point to a threshold separating the logic of theory from the logics of moral practices of professions. This all points to breaks in the knowledge-power-legitimacy chain of professions. 3) The concern of social dominance and that of the knowledge-power-legitimacy chain is now united in the symbolic order of prophecies. Evidence suggests that professions provide a surplus of meaning by virtue of some prophecies they carry with them. This symbolic resource creates an ambiguity between professional neutrality and determining the personal morale of prophecies, with consequences for both knowledge of and about professions.
References
Abbott, A. (1988). The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. University of Chicago Press.
Axford, B. (2002). A sociological study of the shift from autonomy based in expertise to professional accountability based in performativity. University of Canberra.
Bourdieu, P. (1997). The logic of Practice. Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2019). Classification Struggles. General Sociology, Volume 1 (1981-1982). Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations. Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2002). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bourdieu, P., Chamboredon, J-C. & Passeron, J.-C. (1991). The Craft of Sociology. Epistemological Preliminaries. Walter de Gruyter.
Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J.-C. (1979). The Inheritors: French Students and Their Relation to Culture. University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, Loïc J, D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Polity Press.
Brante, T. (1992). Expert Society: The Origins and Development of Professions in Sweden. Studies of Higher Education and Research, no. 2.
Brante, T. (2011). Professions as Science-Based Occupations. Professions and Professionalism, 1(1), 4-20. http://journals.hioa.no/index.php/pp/article/view/147
Brante, T. (2013). The Professional Landscape: The Historical Development of Professions in Sweden. Professions and Professionalism, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.558
Collins, R. (1990). Changing conceptions in the sociology of the professions. In R. Torstendahl & B. Burrage (Eds.), The formation of Professions. Knowledge, state and Strategy (pp. 11-23). SAGE Publications.
Fournier, V. (1999). The appeal to ‘professionalism’ as a disciplinary mechanism. The Sociological Review, 47(2), 280-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00173
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and other Inmates. Anchor Books.
Grendal, O. N. (2021). Karakterforskjeller etter sosial bakgrunn nær like markert som for 10 år siden [Differences in grades by social background are almost the same as 10 years ago]. Statistisk sentralbyrå [Statistics Norway]. https://www.ssb.no/utdanning/artikler-og-publikasjoner/karakterforskjeller-etter-sosial-bakgrunn-naer-like-markert-som-for-10-ar-siden
Larson, M. S. (1977). The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. University of California Press.
Mastekaasa, A. (2011). How important is Autonomy to Professional Workers? Profession & Professionalism, 1(1), 36-51. http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-29726
Moore, G.E. (1903). Principia Ethica. Cambridge University Press.
Olsen, B. (2020). T R Ø S T: bidrag til en jordnær, kropsnær og omtænksom pædagogik [On consolation. Contribution to a down-to-earth, bodily and reflexive pedagogy]. Akademisk Forlag.
Peters, M. (2004). Education and the Philosophy of the Body: Bodies of Knowledge and Knowledges of the Body. In L. Bresler (Ed.). Knowing Bodies, Moving Minds: Towards Embodied teaching and Learning (pp. 13-27). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Saks, M. (2012). Defining a Profession: The Role of Knowledge and Expertise. Profession & Professionalism, 2(1). http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-30970
Saks, M. & Adams, T. L. (2019). Neo-Weberianism, Professional Formation and the State: Inside the Black Box. Profession & Professionalism, 9(2). http://doi.org/10.7577
Svensson, K., & Åström, K. (2013). The Field of Social Regulation: How the State Creates a Profession. Professions and Professionalism, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.557
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bent Olsen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
