Which characteristics are important for species identification of birds in flight? Results from a survey of Norwegian birdwatchers

Forfattere

  • Roel May Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA)
  • Jiska van Dijk Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA)
  • Bård Gunnar Stokke Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15845/on.v48.4196

Emneord (Nøkkelord):

Analytical Hierarchy Process , appearance, Bayesian Belief Network, environment, flight characteristics, species filter

Sammendrag

Cover photo: Great Skua Catharacta skua. Photo: Terje Lislevand.

A better understanding of how birdwatchers identify species of birds in flight may support the development of machine learning algorithms for automated identification from camera-tracking systems for bird monitoring and mitigation. Norwegian birdwatchers scored the importance of 18 criteria for identifying species of birds in flight in an online anonymous survey. Responses were analysed using an Analytical Hierarchy Process and Bayesian Belief Networks. Species identification was first affected by a seasonal expectation as to which species may be observed during a birding trip. Criteria linked to bird’s appearance were most important for species identification, including plumage colouration or patterns; body and wing shape; beak, neck and tail shape. However, flight pattern and speed may provide additional information. A hierarchical approach to categorisation and species identification may improve processing time of automated algorithms.

Referanser

Almende BV, Thieurmel B & Robert T. 2019. visNetwork: Network Visualization using ‚vis.js’ Library. R package version 2.0.9. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=visNetwork.

Berg T, Liu J, Lee SW, Alexander ML, Jacobs DW & Belhumeur PN. 2014. Birdsnap: Large-scale fine-grained visual categorization of birds. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2014: 2011–2018.

Chen SH & Pollino CA. 2012. Good practice in Bayesian network modelling. Environmental Modeling Software 37: 134–145.

Cho F. 2019. ahpsurvey: Analytic Hierarchy Process for Survey Data. R package version 0.4.1. https://cran.r-project.org/package=ahpsurvey.

Datta D. 2017. blandr: a Bland-Altman Method Comparison package for R. R package version 0.6.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=blandr.

Ferreira AC, Silva LR, Renna F, Brandl HB, Renoult JP, Farine DR, Covas R & Doutrelant C. 2020. Deep learning-based methods for individual recognition in small birds. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11: 1072–1085.

Goepel KD. 2018. Implementation of an online software tool for the analytic hierarchy process (AHP-OS). International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process 10: 469–487.

Grill-Spector K, & Kanwisher N. 2005. Visual recognition: as soon as you know it is there, you know what it is. Psychological Science 16: 152–160.

Harker P. 1987. Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical Modelling 9: 837–848.

Lerner H. & Tunón H. 2012. What knowledge is ’jizz’? Ornis Svecica 22: 73–79.

Liu Y, Zhang J, Tjondronegoro D & Geve S. 2007. A shape ontology framework for bird classification. 9th Biennial Conference of the Australian Pattern Recognition Society on Digital Image Computing Techniques and Applications, Glenelg, SA, Australia 2007: 478–484.

Marini A, Facon, J & Koerich AL. 2013. Bird species classification based on color features. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Manchester, UK 2013: 4336–4341.

McClure CJW, Martinson L, & Allison TD. 2018. Automated monitoring for birds in flight: Proof of concept with eagles at a wind power facility. Biological Conservation 224: 26–33.

McClure CJW, Rolek BW, Dunn L, McCabe JD, Martinson L. & Katzner T. 2021. Eagle fatalities are reduced by automated curtailment of wind turbines. Journal of Applied Ecology 58: 446–452.

Misran MFR, Roslin EN & Mohd Nur N. 2020. AHP-Consensus judgement on transitional decision-making: with a discussion on the relation towards open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 6: 63.

Niemi J & Tanttu JT. 2018. Deep learning case study for automatic bird identification. Applied Science 8: 2089.

Niemi J & Tanttu JT. 2020. Deep learning–based automatic bird identification system for offshore wind farms. Wind Energy 23: 1394–1407.

R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org.

Scutari M. 2010. Learning Bayesian Networks with the bnlearn R Package. Journal of Statistical Software 35: 1–22.

Thorpe S, Fize D & Marlot C. 1996. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381: 520–522.

Great Skua. Photo: Terje Lislevand.

Nedlastinger

Publisert

2025-11-10

Hvordan referere

May, R., van Dijk, J., & Stokke, B. G. (2025). Which characteristics are important for species identification of birds in flight? Results from a survey of Norwegian birdwatchers. Ornis Norvegica, 48, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.15845/on.v48.4196

Utgave

Seksjon

Articles