Cross-Cultural PhD Supervision in Norway: A Reflective Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15845/norsotl.v1.4703Keywords:
Cross-cultural supervision, doctoral education, Norway, reflectionAbstract
This study explores the dynamics of supervising a Chinese PhD student by a French supervisor at a Norwegian university, using a reflective, single-case study and thematic analysis. It examines how three distinct cultural and educational systems intersect, revealing challenges, opportunities, and areas for growth in supervisory practice. The findings offer some insights for improving multicultural supervision, including encouraging direct communication, embracing silence as part of discussions, articulating clear expectations, providing specific feedback, and tailoring supervision to individual needs. The study is grounded in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning and highlights how reflective practices in partnership with students can enhance both learning and supervisory effectiveness.
References
Åkerlind, G. S. (2008). Growing and developing as a university researcher. Higher Education, 55(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9052-x
Beaumont, C., O’Doherty, M., & Shannon, L. (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning? Studies in higher education, 36(6), 671–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003731135
Bengtsen, S. S., & McAlpine, L. (2022). A novel perspective on doctoral supervision: Interaction of time, academic work, institutional policies, and lifecourse. Learning and Teaching, 15(1), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2022.150103
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Volume I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay Company.
Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Wiley.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. John Wiley & Sons.
Campbell, J., & Li, M. (2008). Asian students’ voices: An empirical study of Asian students’ learning experiences at a New Zealand university. Journal of Studies in International Education, 12(4), 375–396. https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1177 /1028315307299422
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Carter, S., & Kumar, V. (2017). ‘Ignoring me is part of learning’: Supervisory feedback on doctoral writing. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1123104
Dimitrov, N. (2009). Western guide to mentoring graduate students across cultures.
Western University, Teaching Support Centre. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14721/13525
Eckstein, G., Coca, K., Lung, Y. S. M., & McMurry, B. L. (2024). Praise in written feedback: How L2 writers perceive and value praise. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 40(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2023.2175341
Felten, P. (2013). Principles of Good Practice in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.121
Gansemer-Topf, A. M., McCloud, L. I., & Braxton, J. M. (2024). Defining the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL). New Directions for Student Services, 2024(185), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20502
Gatfield, T. (2005). An investigation into PhD supervisory management styles: Development of a dynamic conceptual model and its managerial implications. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(3), 311–325. https: //doi.org/10.1080/13600800500283585
Gröschl, S., & Barrows, C. W. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of french and british managers: An examination of the influence of higher education on management style. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 4(3), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw Hill LLC.
Hu, R., & Smith, J. J. (2011). Cultural perspectives on teaching and learning: A collaborative self-study of two professors’ first year teaching experiences. Studying Teacher Education, 7(01), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2011.558347
Hu, Y., Van Veen, K., & Corda, A. (2016). Pushing too little, praising too much? Intercultural misunderstandings between a Chinese doctoral student and a Dutch supervisor. Studying Teacher Education, 12(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2015.1111204
Hu, Y., Zhao, X., & van Veen, K. (2020). Unraveling the implicit challenges in fostering independence: Supervision of Chinese doctoral students at Dutch universities. Instructional Science, 48(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09505-6
Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L. S. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change: The magazine of Higher learning, 31(5), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091389909604218
Ku, H.-Y., Lahman, M. K., Yeh, H.-T., & Cheng, Y.-C. (2008). Into the academy: Preparing and mentoring international doctoral students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(3), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9083-0
Mainhard, T., Van Der Rijst, R., Van Tartwijk, J., & Wubbels, T. (2009). A model for the supervisor–doctoral student relationship. Higher education, 58, 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9199-8
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9199-8
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary educational psychology, 8(3), 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(83)90019-X
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Sheu, H.-C. (2018). Language learning strategies and intercultural competence in the year abroad study in china. In F. Dervin, X. Du, & A. Härkönen (Eds.), International students in china: Education, student life and intercultural encounters
(pp. 195–220). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78120-4_9
Sinclair, M. (2004). The pedagogy of’good’PhD supervision: A national cross-disciplinary investigation of PhD supervision. Department of Education, Science; Training Canberra. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-4-2-4
Spizzica, M. (1997). Cultural differences within “western” and “eastern” education. Academic Communication Across Disciplines and Cultures, 1–9.
Steen-Utheim, A., & Wittek, A. L. (2017). Dialogic feedback and potentialities for student learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 15, 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.06.002
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann,
G., Rossano, F., De Ruiter, J. P., Yoon, K.-E., et al. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587–10592. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 0903616106
Sutton, P. (2012). Conceptualizing feedback literacy: Knowing, being, and acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(1), 31–40. https ://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.647781
Sweitzer, V. (2009). Towards a theory of doctoral student professional identity development: A developmental networks approach. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2009.11772128
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard university press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Wieland, M. (1991). Turn-taking structure as a source of misunderstanding in French–American cross-cultural conversation. In L. F. Bouton & Y. Kachru (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (pp. 101–118, Vol. 2). Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Witte, J., Van der Wende, M., & Huisman, J. (2008). Blurring boundaries: How the Bologna process changes the relationship between university and non-university higher education in Germany, the Netherlands and France. Studies in Higher
Education, 33(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049129
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Etienne Cheynet, Yuanchen Wan, Kenan Dikilitaş
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
