The article presents key findings from a recent Norwegian study of penal attitudes in the population compared to the actual penal level. The research design combined telephone survey to explore general opinions about actual penal level, with a questionnaire study to explore which punishments that Norwegian citizens would inflict in six specific cases. Actual level of punishment was decided by Norwegian professional judges. The questionnaire was both mailed to a nationwide representative sample and answered by representative focus groups participants. The groups also discussed punishments in specific cases. People agree that the courts inflict too lenient punishments, but that is because people underestimate the sentences inflicted by courts. In specific cases people would themselves inflict less imprisonment than courts would have done. Although there is widespread disagreement among people about sanctions for specific crimes, there is an astonishing concordance between medians of punishments that the population samples would inflict and the actual level of punishment. I argue that the main explanation for the concordance is that both laypeople and criminal courts mainly determine sanctions according to the principle of proportionality.
Copyright (c) 2014 Leif Petter Olaussen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.