A New Legal Science?

Authors

  • Martin Mindestrømmen Universitetet i Bergen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15845/bjclcj.v14i1.5166

Abstract

Comment.

References

Byrne W H and Olsen H P (2024) Doctrinal Legal Science: A Science of Its Own? Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 37(2), 343. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2024.16.

Dubber M (2025) New Legal Science in the Dual Penal State – Critical Analysis of Law and the Legitimacy of State Power. Bergen Journal of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 13(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.15845/bjclcj.v13i1.4525.

Graver H P (1998) Nyere utviklingslinjer i norsk rettsvitenskap. Lov og Rett 37(10) 579. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-3061-1998-10-02.

Jacobsen J (2025) Brotsverket mishandling i nære relasjonar (straffelova § 282). Karnov.

Jacobsen J (2021) How can Legal Doctrine be a Scientific Discipline? In eds. Matsuzawa S and Nuotio K, Methodology of Criminal Law Theory. Art, Politics or Science? Badenbaden: Nomos/Hart Publishing, 105-128. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748904755-105.

Mindestrømmen M (2025) Fare, risiko og farlighet – En analyse i kontekst av strafferettslige særreaksjoner i norsk rett. Karnov.

Mæhle S S (2005) Gjelder det andre regler for rettslig argumentasjon i rettsdogmatikken enn for domstolene. Jussens Venner 39(5-6), 329. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-3126-2004-05-06-04.

Taekema S and van der Burg W (2024) Contextualising Legal Research – A Methodological Guide. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035307395.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-13

How to Cite

Mindestrømmen, M. (2026). A New Legal Science?. Bergen Journal of Criminal Law & Criminal Justice, 14(1), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.15845/bjclcj.v14i1.5166