New Legal Science in the Dual Penal State
Critical Analysis of Law and the Legitimacy of State Power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15845/bjclcj.v13i1.4525Abstract
New Legal Science pushes legal discourse beyond its traditional parochialism to tackle fundamental issues confronting all modern legal systems as such, including the legitimacy challenge of state power through ‘law’ posed most acutely by penal law.
References
Ashworth A (2011) The Unfairness of Risk-Based Possession Offences. Crim. L. & Phil. 5, 237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-011-9112-2
Berman H J and Reid C J (1996) The Transformation of English Legal Science: From Hale to Blackstone. Emory L.J. 45, 437.
Blackstone W (1769) Commentaries on the Laws of England (Vol. 4). Clarendon Press.
Bush J (1993) Free to Enslave: The Foundations of Colonial American Slave Law. Yale J.L. & Human. 5, 417.
Cairns H (1941) The Theory of Legal Science. University of North Carolina Press.
Cohen M R (1932) Philosophy and Legal Science. Colum. L. Rev. 32, 1103. https://doi.org/10.2307/1116198
Colquhoun P (1814) A Treatise on the Wealth, Power, and Resources of the British Empire etc. Printed for J. Mawman.
Crick B (1959) The American Science of Politics: Its Origins and Conditions. University of California Press.
Critical Analysis of Law and the New Interdisciplinarity (2014) Critical Analysis of Law (Special Issue) 1 (1).
Dubber M D (1993) Judicial Positivism and Hitler’s Injustice. Colum. L. Rev. 93, 1807. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123061
Dubber M D (2002) Policing Possession: The War on Crime and the End of Criminal Law. J. Crim. L. & Criminology 91, 829. https://doi.org/10.2307/1144154
Dubber M D (2002) Victims in the War on Crime: The Use and Abuse of Victims’ Rights. NYU Press.
Dubber M D (2005a) The Possession Paradigm: The Special Part and the Police Power Model of the Criminal Process in eds. Duff R A and Green S Defining Crimes: Essays on the Criminal Law’s Special Part. Oxford University Press, 91. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199269228.003.0005
Dubber M D (2005b) The Police Power: Patriarchy and the Foundations of American Government. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/dubb13206
Dubber M D (2009) Die Anspruchslosigkeit des awissenschaftlichen Strafrechts. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 121, 977. https://doi.org/10.1515/ZSTW.2009.977
Dubber M D (2015) New Historical Jurisprudence: Legal History as Critical Analysis of Law. Critical Analysis of Law 2, 1. https://doi.org/10.33137/cal.v2i1.22512
Dubber M D (2016) The Schizophrenic Jury and Other Palladia of Liberty: A Critical Historical Analysis. Comp. Legal Hist. 3, 306.
Dubber M D (2018) The Dual Penal State: The Crisis of Criminal Law in Comparative- Historical Perspective. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198744290.001.0001
Dubber M D (2019a) Comparative Criminal Law in eds. Reimann M and Zimmermann R The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law 2nd ed., 1276. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.013.41
Dubber M D (2019b) Criminal Process in the Dual Penal State: A Comparative- Historical Analysis in eds. Brown D, Turner J I and Weisser B The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process, 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190659837.013.1
Dubber M D and Valverde M (eds.) (2006) The New Police Science: The Police Power in Domestic and International Governance. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503625921
Dubber M D and Valverde M (eds.) (2008) Police and the Liberal State. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804779777
Engel C and Schön W (eds.) (2007) Das Proprium der Rechtswissenschaft. Mohr Siebeck.
Eskridge W N and Frickey P P (1994) The Making of The Legal Process. Harv. L. Rev. 107, 2031. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341767
Fernandez A and Dubber M D (eds.) (2012) Law Books in Action: Essays on the Anglo-American Legal Treatise. Hart Publishing.
Flavius G (Kantorowicz H) (1906) Der Kampf um die Rechtswissenschaft. Carl Winter.
Fraenkel E (1941) The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship. Oxford University Press.
Freund E (1904) The Police Power: Public Policy and Constitutional Rights. University of Chicago Press.
Goble G W (1933) Law as a Science. Ind. L.J. 9, 294.
Goldberg J C P (2012) Pragmatism and Private Law. Harv. L. Rev. 125, 1640.
Gordley J and Mattei U (1996) Protecting Possession. Am. J. Comp. L. 44, 293. https://doi.org/10.2307/840711
Holmes Jr. O W (1897) The Path of the Law. Harv. L. Rev. 10, 457. https://doi.org/10.2307/1322028
Horwitz M J (1980) Law and Economics: Politics or Science? Hofstra L. Rev. 8, 905.
Jakobs G (2007) Strafrecht als wissenschaftliche Disziplin in eds. Engel and Schön Das Proprium der Rechtswissenschaft 103.
Jefferson T (1829) Letter to Judge Tyler, June 17, 1812 in ed. Randolph T J Memoirs, Correspondence, and Private Papers of Thomas Jefferson (Vol. 4), 182.
Jestaedt M and Lepsius O (eds.) (2008) Rechtswissenschaftstheorie. Mohr Siebeck.
Jestaz P and Jamin C (2004) La doctrine. Dalloz.
Jhering R v (1884) Im juristischen Begriffshimmel: Ein Phantasiebild in Scherz und Ernst in der Jurisprudenz: Eine Weihnachtsgabe für das juristische Publikum, 245.
Kantorowicz H U and Patterson E W (1928) Legal Science: A Summary of Its Methodology. Colum. L. Rev. 28, 679. https://doi.org/10.2307/1113061
Kennedy D (1982) The Stages of the Decline of the Public/Private Distinction. U. Pa. L. Rev. 130, 1349. https://doi.org/10.2307/3311974
Kingsbury B et al. (2005) The Emergence of Global Administrative Law. Law & Contemp. Probs. 68, 15.
Kirchmann J v (1848) Die Werthlosigkeit der Jurisprudenz als Wissenschaft. Julius Springer.
Kornhauser L (2022) The Economic Analysis of Law in ed. Zalta E N The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition).
Lagodny O (1996) Strafrecht vor den Schranken der Grundrechte. Mohr Siebeck.
Langer M (2014) The Long Shadow of the Adversarial and Inquisitorial Categories in eds. Dubber M D and Hörnle T The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Law, 887.
Lepore J (2020) The Invention of the Police. New Yorker.
Lepsius O (2002) Besitz und Sachherrschaft im öffentlichen Recht. Mohr Siebeck.
Llewellyn K (1941) The Theory of Legal ‘Science’ N.C. L. Rev. 20, 1.
Machiavelli N (1532) The Prince (Parks T trans. 2009).
Macias S (2016) Legal Science in the Early Republic: The Origins of American Legal Thought and Education. Lexington.
Müller I (1987) Furchtbare Juristen: Die unbewältigte Vergangenheit unserer Justiz. Kindler.
Naucke W (1973) Über das Verhältnis von Strafrechtswissenschaft und Strafrechtspraxis. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 85, 399. https://doi.org/10.1515/zstw.1973.85.2.399
Pawlik M (2007) Strafrechtswissenschaftstheorie in eds. Pawlik M et al. Festschrift für Günther Jakobs, 469.
Posner R (1973) Economic Analysis of Law. Little Brown.
Posner R (2000) Savigny, Holmes, and the Law and Economics of Possession. Va. L. Rev. 86, 535. https://doi.org/10.2307/1073961
Radzinowicz L and Turner J W F (eds.) (1945) The Modern Approach to Criminal Law: Collected Essays. Macmillan & Co.
Reimann M (1990) Nineteenth Century German Legal Science. B.C. L. Rev. 31, 837.
Savigny F C v (1803) Das Recht des Besitzes: Eine civilistische Abhandlung. Heyer.
Savigny F C v (1848) Von Savigny’s Treatise on Possession; or The Jus Possessionis of the Civil Law (6th ed.) (Perry E trans.). S. Sweet.
Schuppert G F (2003) Staatswissenschaft. Nomos.
Schweber H (1999) The ‘Science’ of Legal Science: The Model of the Natural Sciences in Nineteenth-Century American Legal Education. Law & Hist. Rev. 17, 421. https://doi.org/10.2307/744378
Simpson A W B (1981) The Rise and Fall of the Legal Treatise: Legal Principles and the Forms of Legal Literature. U. Chi. L. Rev. 48, 632. https://doi.org/10.2307/1599330
Smits J M (2012) The Mind and Method of the Legal Academic. Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857936554
Stein P (1986) The Tasks of Historical Jurisprudence in eds. MacCormick N and Birks P The Legal Mind: Essays for Tony Honoré, 293.
Wechsler H (1952) The Challenge of a Model Penal Code. Harv. L. Rev. 65, 1097. https://doi.org/10.2307/1337048
Wells C P (1994) Holmes on Legal Method: The Predictive Theory of Law as an Instance of Scientific Method. S. Ill. U. L.J. 18, 329.
Wiethölter R (1968) Rechtswissenschaft. Fischer.
Wiethölter R (1973) Rechtswissenschaft in Kritik und als Kritik.
Wissenschaftsrat (2012) Perspektiven der Rechtswissenschaft in Deutschland: Situation, Analysen, Empfehlungen (Drs. 2558-12).
Xenophon (1995) Oikonomikos (Oeconomicus: A Social and Historical Commentary, with a New English Translation [Pomeroy S B trans. 1995]). Clarendon.
Yaffe G (2016) In Defense of Criminal Possession. Crim. L. & Phil. 10, 441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-014-9321-6
Yntema H E (1931) Mr. Justice Holmes’ View of Legal Science. Yale L.J. 40, 696. https://doi.org/10.2307/790658
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Markus Dubber
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
