Political Shakespeare and the Blessing of Art
HTML
PDF

How to Cite

McPartland, P. “Political Shakespeare and the Blessing of Art”. Early Modern Culture Online, Vol. 4, no. 1, Mar. 2018, doi:10.15845/emco.v4i1.1507.

Abstract

This text attempts to detail the functions and effects of some of Shakespeare's aesthetic strategies, and to determine their relationship to ideology. While this is critical territory that cultural materialists and new historicists have extensively mapped, the current text avoids the preferred methods of enquiry that these lines take. Rather than giving focus to the containment strategies of a dominant ideology, my investigation proceeds via a close reading of certain elements from Act 5 of Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream. I attempt to demonstrate that meaning in the play is determined and encompassed within the self-reflective and dissimulating structures of Shakespeare's art. I suggest that such an aesthetic premise offers a set of conditions that allows the play to operate in a manner which distinguishes it from its immediate cultural circumstances. This also means that when the ideological world beyond the stage is given re-presentation within the performance's illusory structures, it necessarily undergoes something like a disfiguration. I end by briefly remarking how even if the aesthetic structures of Shakespeare's plays realise themselves as distinct from, and as disfiguring of, ideology, they may still nonetheless be subject to it.

https://doi.org/10.15845/emco.v4i1.1507
HTML
PDF

References

Barber, C. L. Shakespeare's Festive Comedy Princeton; Princeton University Press, 1959.

Lawson, Nigel. The View from No. 11: Memoirs of a Tory Radical. London: Bantam, 1992.

Montrose, Louis. The Purpose of Playing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.

Parker, Patricia. "(Peter) Quince: Love Potions, Carpenter’s Coigns and Athenian Weddings.” Shakespeare Survey 57. Ed. Peter Holland Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 39-54.

Portillo, Michael. “Major’s Woes: Poison of a new British Disease: Michael Portillo: The speech” The Independent, 16 Jan. 1994, p. 20.

Tennenhouse, Leonard. “Strategies of State and Political Plays.” Political Shakespeare. Eds. Jonathan Dollimore, Alan Sinfield. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2012. P. 109-128.

Copyright (c) 2018 Perry McPartland

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Bergen Open Access Publishing