Expulsion or Imprisonment? Criminal Law Sanctions for Breaching an Entry Ban in the Light of Crimmigration Law

Jim Waasdorp, Aniel Pahladsingh

Abstract


At EU-level, the use of substantive criminal law as a response to illegal migration is materialised by both the EU legislator and the Member States individually. EU involvement in criminalizing illegal migration takes place in a twofold manner: directly, through harmonization of national legislations, and indirectly, through the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). An example of the latter is the case law of the CJEU regarding criminal law sanctions for breaching an entry ban. In 2008 the EU adopted the Return Directive. This directive aims at establishing common standards and procedures to be applied in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals. To actually effectuate their return, the Return Directive provides for several instruments, inter alia, entry bans. In this article, we will analyse six judgments of the CJEU in the light of crimmigration law and make a distinction between the Member Statesʼ power to classify a breach of an entry ban as an offence and to lay down criminal law sanctions in national legislation, and their power to impose such sanctions.

Key notes: Return Directive, entry ban, illegal migrant, criminal law sanctions, crimmigration, expulsion  

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15845/bjclcj.v4i2.1070



Copyright (c) 2017 Jim Waasdorp, Aniel Pahladsingh

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

UiB

University of Bergen
Faculty of Law › Research group for Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure

ISSN: 1894-4183